5 Cameyo Alternatives and Replacements for 2025
The 2024 acquisition of Cameyo by Google marked a significant shift in the virtual application delivery (VAD) landscape. As Cameyo doubles down on optimizing its solutions for Chrome OS and Google’s ecosystem, many independent software vendors (ISVs) with diverse needs may find themselves seeking alternatives. While Cameyo’s new direction prioritizes the Chrome environment, ISVs operating across multiple platforms or with unique infrastructure requirements need a replacement that better aligns with their goals.
In this article, we explore five alternatives and replacements to Cameyo for 2025, comparing their ease of use, cost structures, and focus on ISVs.
1. GO-Global
Ease of Use
GO-Global provides an intuitive and lightweight platform for delivering Windows applications without the need for complex client installations. Its straightforward deployment process minimizes technical overhead, making it a favorite among ISVs looking for a simple yet powerful solution.
Cost
GO-Global offers one of the most competitive pricing models in the market:
- 25 - 99 concurrent users: $4.20/month ($41.40 paid annually per user)
- 100 - 499 concurrent users: $3.85/month ($38.40 annually per user)
- 500 - 999 concurrent users: $3.45/month ($34.20 annually per user)
- 1,000 - 4,999 concurrent users: $3.15/month ($31.20 annually per user)
- 5,000 - 9,999 concurrent users: $2.85/month ($28.20 annually per user)
- Single Sign-On (SSO) add-on: $0.50/month per concurrent user
This concurrent cost structure ensures affordability for ISVs, particularly those scaling their operations.
Focus on ISVs
GO-Global’s focus on enabling ISVs to deliver software efficiently without requiring costly infrastructure investments makes it an excellent fit for businesses seeking flexibility and scalability. Its platform supports diverse deployment scenarios, aligning well with ISV priorities.
{{CTAEMBED_IDENTIFIER}}
2. Azure Virtual Desktop (AVD)
Ease of Use
Azure Virtual Desktop integrates seamlessly with Microsoft’s ecosystem but has a steeper learning curve for new users. ISVs with experience in Microsoft environments may find AVD manageable, while others could face challenges with its initial configuration.
Cost
AVD’s pay-as-you-go pricing model can be cost-effective for smaller deployments but tends to escalate with scale. For ISVs, the variability in costs can pose budgeting challenges, especially if usage patterns are unpredictable.
Focus on ISVs
While AVD offers robust capabilities, it is primarily a desktop virtualization solution designed for comprehensive enterprise needs. This level of robustness often exceeds the requirements of most ISVs, who may find AVD overly complex and misaligned with their focus on streamlined application delivery.
3. Citrix Virtual Apps
Ease of Use
Citrix Virtual Apps is known for its extensive features and robust performance, but this complexity can make it harder to deploy and maintain. Organizations with dedicated IT resources might appreciate its capabilities, but smaller ISVs could struggle with its demanding setup.
Cost
Citrix’s pricing is on the higher end, often requiring significant upfront investments and ongoing costs. While its feature set justifies the price for large enterprises, ISVs might find it less cost-effective for their needs.
Focus on ISVs
Citrix primarily caters to enterprises, with less emphasis on ISVs. Its comprehensive feature set may appeal to some ISVs, but many will find it excessive for their requirements.
4. Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS)
Ease of Use
Parallels RAS simplifies application delivery with a user-friendly interface and quick deployment process. While it is not specifically tailored to ISVs, it serves as a suitable replacement for Citrix due to its balance of features and accessibility.
Cost
Parallels RAS pricing starts at $10 per user per month, making it a more expensive option than GO-Global but still competitive compared to Citrix. For ISVs managing larger user bases, the costs can quickly add up.
Focus on ISVs
Parallels RAS balances enterprise-level features with usability, but its broader market focus may dilute its alignment with the specific needs of ISVs.
5. VMware Horizon
Ease of Use
VMware Horizon delivers powerful virtualization features, but its complexity can be daunting for ISVs without dedicated IT teams. The platform has recently undergone an acquisition and rebranding to Omnissa, which has added to confusion among users. It remains better suited for enterprises with the resources to manage its intricate environment.
Cost
VMware Horizon’s pricing varies significantly based on deployment size and requirements. Its higher costs and resource demands make it less accessible to smaller ISVs.
Focus on ISVs
Although VMware Horizon supports diverse use cases, its focus leans heavily toward large-scale enterprise deployments. ISVs might find its offerings overly complex and misaligned with their core needs.
Conclusion
The acquisition of Cameyo by Google has left many ISVs searching for a replacement that aligns with their unique requirements. Among the alternatives, GO-Global stands out as the ideal choice. Its ease of use, competitive pricing, and clear focus on enabling ISVs to succeed make it the perfect replacement for Cameyo.
As ISVs navigate the evolving Virtual Application Delivery landscape in 2025, GO-Global provides a solution tailored to their needs, ensuring seamless application delivery without compromise. Meet with their team to learn more or download a free 30 day trial.
See how GO-Global provides a simple, cost-effective replacement